face moments like Rafa at the U.S. Open, we enter the immediate need for beyond the current rating. It's not just the U.S. Open winner or the winner of 3 of the last 4 tournaments that make up the annual Grand Slam tennis. Rafa falls squarely in the debate over who is the best English athlete in history.
These issues are so appealing, precisely because of intractable and quite subjective. The contribution of this column, passionate about the subject, is to add evidence, noting, though, that these elements could not be found in any statistics and coherent logic. Keeping to individual disciplines, we read that Rafa's uncle anticipated Carles Costa, former player and current manager, that his nephew would be a set of tennis when the child was 5. At that age, so tender, we imagine Indurain surely 'Ruedin' on the bike, entering Severiano Ballesteros golf escape Pedreña some anger from his father, and we have no news of Angel Nieto uploaded on a machine with motor. Fernando Alonso only we know the winner of (small) large rewards, but also that his character was already a boy with few friends and few smiles. Buckling
those early end to these, we are not able to find a rival Induráin crying like a child at the awards ceremony, unable to congratulate the winner between groans and sorrow, and of course a case similar to Federer in the space of Severiano, this neat and sustained world of golf, as 'british'. Nieto we need the report, and Alonso we know is that it was he who ended a victory in Hamilton raging, without wasting a tear, of course.
All this contribution, surely absurd, all you try is to support the theory of this corner, as rivals to the subjective award have been and are amazing athletes, and competitors, Rafa is a direct experiment for NASA in Mallorca ideal fit for a brain in the body perfect, with the right environment and a way of overcoming technical psychological and never seen before. So is better or worse than the rest? We should not compare athletes with Martians.
0 comments:
Post a Comment